From: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
msysgit@googlegroups.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [msysGit] [FYI][PATCH] Customizing the WinGit installer
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:53:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081007015336.GU21650@dpotapov.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810061246460.3208@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:47:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > It is not a bug.
>
> If it's unwanted functionality, that's a bug. That's kind of the whole
> (and only) difference between "bug" and "feature". Do people want it?
It looks like you have changed your opinion since what you wrote half
a year ago.
Back then you said:
> Yeah. Why not just rather than the whole ok/cancel discussion, go with a
> single button saying "good for me!" and be done with it.
>
> IOW, the license thing should be considered *informational* rather than a
> choice. Because to a user, that's exactly what the GPL is.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.msysgit/1677
Also, please, re-read what Junio said in this thread:
"I think removing the license dialog is a bad idea. You need to
tell the end-user about his rights, and one of the things is
that he can get source to git under the terms of GPLv2. The bug
is not about showing the license, but is about refusing to
install unless the end user agrees with it."
I think such a step as removing the license should be approved by
Junio and not be taken behind his back as it's happening now.
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-07 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 12:27 [FYI][PATCH] Customizing the WinGit installer Petr Baudis
2008-10-06 14:22 ` [msysGit] " Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-06 14:18 ` Petr Baudis
2008-10-06 15:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-06 16:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-06 16:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-06 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-06 17:51 ` Bruce Stephens
2008-10-06 17:54 ` Robin Burchell
2008-10-06 18:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-06 19:47 ` [msysGit] " Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 1:53 ` Dmitry Potapov [this message]
2008-10-07 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-07 3:08 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-10-07 7:46 ` Heikki Orsila
2008-10-07 9:28 ` [msysGit] " Petr Baudis
2008-10-08 7:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-06 20:11 ` [msysGit] " Heikki Orsila
2008-10-07 1:59 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-10-07 2:40 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-10-07 7:42 ` Heikki Orsila
2008-10-06 21:19 ` Abdelrazak Younes
2008-10-06 17:23 ` Petr Baudis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081007015336.GU21650@dpotapov.dyndns.org \
--to=dpotapov@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=msysgit@googlegroups.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).