From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: refactor input parameters parse/validation
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:45:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810081145.37983.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb7bb73a0810080210s49d1683dj4e2fef8072522abd@mail.gmail.com>
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be simpler and as good solution to just leave validation
> > off evaluate_path_info() (well, of course except check_head_link() test),
> > and allow it to be validated when assigning global 'params' variables?
> > check_head_link() would be repeated for path_info links, but that
> > should not affect performance much.
>
> Well, it does have a performance hit in the case of invalid $project
> since it spends time working on the rest of the URL before bailing
> out, but it's probably the cleanest solution. I'll do it this way.
I have forgot about this fact, that parameter validation serves also
as early escape. But I don't think it is much performance hit in
practice; it is performance (optimization) vs. maintability tradeoff.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-08 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 17:19 [PATCH] gitweb: refactor input parameters parse/validation Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-07 10:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-07 12:42 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-07 14:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-08 9:10 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-08 9:45 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-10-08 9:26 ` [PATCHv2] " Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-10 8:37 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-10 15:01 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-10 17:33 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-10-10 18:42 ` [PATCHv3] " Giuseppe Bilotta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810081145.37983.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).