From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Untracked working tree files Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:30:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20081015133047.e31537b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20081015115654.fb34438f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081015124949.b657a8db.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: david@lang.hm, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 15 22:33:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KqD32-0000dq-Ov for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:32:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753681AbYJOUbg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:31:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753643AbYJOUbg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:31:36 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:36916 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753513AbYJOUbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:31:35 -0400 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.55]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id m9FKUme9009121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:30:49 -0700 Received: from akpm.corp.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with SMTP id m9FKUl1I000827; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:30:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.869 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4-osdl_revision__1.47__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > - a merge goes south with a data conflict, and since it's all automated, > > you just want to throw it away. > > Actually, with your filename, I suspect the conflict would be not a real > file content, but more of a "delete" conflicting with a modification to > that file. IOW, I'm guessing that the thing you hit with > arch/x86/kernel/apic.c was that some branch you pulled: > > - created that file > > - deleted arch/x86/kernel/apic_[32|64].c > > - the old file got marked as a rename source for the new apic.c and > there was a data conflict when trying to apply the changes. > > as a result, your working tree would have that "apic.c" file in it, but > with conflict markers, and marked as unmerged. That sounds likely. I suspect things were especially bad today because I accidentally pulled four-week-old linux-next, which had over 500 rejects in it.