From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's in git.git (Oct 2008, #03; Tue, 14) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:08:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20081016100805.GA20762@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vej2i7rt9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Arjen Laarhoven , "Shawn O. Pearce" , Mike Ralphson To: Brandon Casey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 16 12:09:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KqPnM-0003pV-7Y for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:09:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752985AbYJPKIL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:08:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753077AbYJPKIL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:08:11 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:1178 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231AbYJPKIJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:08:09 -0400 Received: (qmail 6166 invoked by uid 111); 16 Oct 2008 10:08:07 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:08:07 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:08:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:35:30AM -0500, Brandon Casey wrote: > 2) Do we want to stick with compat/regex on > > Darwin: Arjen > FreeBSD: Jeff > AIX: Mike > > now that the builtin funcname patterns have been converted to Extended > Regular Expressions? t4018 passes without compat/regex on FreeBSD. Is that a sufficient test? -Peff