From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [irq/urgent]: created 3786fc7: "irq: make variable static" Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20081022132148.GA17393@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20081022061730.GA5749@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Ingo Molnar , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 22 15:23:44 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ksdg0-0008Rh-Gc for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:23:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751771AbYJVNVv (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751983AbYJVNVv (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:51 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:4702 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750944AbYJVNVu (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:50 -0400 Received: (qmail 901 invoked by uid 111); 22 Oct 2008 13:21:49 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:49 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:50:52AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: > About printing either forward (git-describe, e.g. v1.6.0.2-590-g67f6062) > or backward (git-name-rev, e.g. tags/v1.6.0-rc2~8): you can use > git-name-rev in filter mode (git log ... | git name-rev --stdin), or > "git log --decorate", or '%d' in --pretty format specifier (this is very > new thing). The "--decorate" and "%d" code just decorates branch _tips_. My impression is that he wanted to see the branch mentioned even if the commit was not at the tip. It would be possible to extend this to print name-rev output, but it would be computationally and memory-intensive, I suspect. -Peff