From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] pack-objects: avoid reading uninitalized data Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20081023153329.GC10804@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20081022202810.GA4439@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20081022203103.GD4547@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 23 17:35:14 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kt2D2-0006dz-Pl for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:34:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753389AbYJWPdh (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752927AbYJWPdd (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:33 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:3963 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752760AbYJWPdc (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:32 -0400 Received: (qmail 10311 invoked by uid 111); 23 Oct 2008 15:33:31 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:31 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:11:16PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > for (;;) { > > - struct object_entry *entry = *list++; > > + struct object_entry *entry; > > struct unpacked *n = array + idx; > > int j, max_depth, best_base = -1; > > > > @@ -1384,6 +1384,7 @@ static void find_deltas(struct object_entry **list, unsigned *list_size, > > progress_unlock(); > > break; > > } > > ---> Please preserve the empty line here so the previous code > chunk still appears logically separate. > > > + entry = *list++; > > (*list_size)--; > > if (!entry->preferred_base) { > > (*processed)++; Er, there was no empty line there (or else there would have been a '-' line in the diff). I am happy to add it, like: if (!*list_size) { progress_unlock(); break; } entry = *list++; (*list_size)--; if (!entry->preferred_base) ... if you like, but the current version seems to format it as one stanza inside of the progress_lock/progress_unlock. Look at the version in 'master' to see what I mean. -Peff