From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:57:36 +0100 Message-ID: <200810271557.37196.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <200810271157.20313.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mercurial@selenic.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: "0000 vk" <0000.vk@gmail.com> X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 27 15:59:13 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuTYb-0005VJ-0R for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:59:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751210AbYJ0O5s (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:57:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751191AbYJ0O5r (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:57:47 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:9599 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751092AbYJ0O5r (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:57:47 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so692400nfc.21 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=dd8VHpe6gG/Ay2kTiyURo5f6YQX8G6LcdNIPORQfuVQ=; b=l3WRnCnp4sad8Ax4Avti9n93u68daprRunt4HCYO6ZTrMy4dQsFvNXk6MbRKYd981l AghhKBMARBRd8rL7//TUaT8SeFm8G4v1WqSy1S1+tvZ1j24FVGj8zogS7RSX9pKIZlC+ NBcpigGrzPBsmIWRxpmnP4ALlxiCtMHBFN4iI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=PEeUwFBHpt20FcLAo44YBMlGAoqqkmXE19Y16AWNHbfegMkDzKZ1itbUx7GjLBspDL GYPcTgJU5Wu0ky1O3EgoH6A55c5Yhbtil1tIpufZQTmD1wYu2q2oySFM2D66s3L5Ilrk HtXWcu3On9u+jnbZr90GBTZjpbyRYX2nSae84= Received: by 10.210.46.12 with SMTP id t12mr6782079ebt.114.1225119465352; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.11? (abvq236.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.214.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c24sm19284ika.8.2008.10.27.07.57.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:57:42 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, 0000 vk wrote: > 2008/10/27 Jakub Narebski > > By the way, going back to the matter of choosing version control > > system for DragonflyBSD; some time ago I have written post > > * "Mercurial's only true "plugin" extension: inotify... > > and can it be done in Git?" > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/76661 > > (current answer: it is possible using 'assume unchanged' bit) > > about how nearly every Mercurial extension has equivalent functionality > > in Git. > > > > But what about the reverse, about the following features and > > issues in Mercurial: [...] > > Jakub, > > Do you know if git supports the equivalent of hg bundle? > Thanks. The equivalent of "hg bundle" (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#bundle) would be "git bundle" (http://git.or.cz/man/git-bundle). I think git-bundle was inspired by Mercurial feature, just like fast-import format and bisect went in other direction. P.S. Could you _please_ quote only relevant fragments of email you are replying to, especially if it is so long? -- Jakub Narebski Poland