git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
To: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de>
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, mercurial@selenic.com, SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:07:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027210716.GS2273@genesis.frugalware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810272149.13542.arne_bab@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2156 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:48:50PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de> wrote:
> 1) Writing Python is much easier and quicker than writing C, especially when 
> you can just experiment with the Python interpreter (or better still: with 
> ipython). No memory management hassle, no strange compiler bugs, no stray 
> pointers. Just plain writing what you want to do. But if you need C speed, you 
> can still include parts written in C - where you really need it. For all other 
> cases you have more readable and far more compact code. 

You compare Python to C here, but did you realize that in git you can
write your git command in any language you want? Of course it's
recommended to do it in C/shell/perl if you want to get it included in
git.git, but that's just a decision.

> 2) You can easily access every core function, and you can replace every 
> command. 
> You don't have to invent a "git foolog" command. Instead you can just adapt 
> the regular log to do a foolog which people can use via "hg log". 

IIRC the main reason git aliases can't overwrite git commands is because
that would break scripts relying on the output of existing git commands.
Given that I install such an extension, won't my script break?

> The defaults should be the most common way to use the tool, so people can 
> easily learn it. 
> 
> Advanced stuff can be added with extensions. 

From a user's point of view, I think external git commands and such hg
plugins are equal. The user instally the "foo"
extension/command/plugin/whatever and gets the "git/hg foo" command.

> And because the most used plugins are distributed with Mercurial, I can also 
> activate them when I don't control the Mercurial installation - and should 
> something be missing which I need, I can just download and activate a plugin 
> without having to compile anything, since they are simply Python modules. 
> 
> Just set 
> [extensions]
> foo = /blah/foo.py
> 
> in ~/.hgrc and the foo plugin is active. 

Same for git, as long as it's written in a scripting language; you
should include git-foo in PATH then you can use git foo.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-27 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-26  4:28 [VOTE] git versus mercurial walt
2008-10-26 14:15 ` [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD) Jakub Narebski
2008-10-26 14:30   ` Maxim Vuets
2008-10-26 15:05     ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-26 18:55       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27  0:20         ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27  4:15           ` Leo Razoumov
2008-10-27  7:16             ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27  7:16             ` dhruva
2008-10-27  0:47         ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27  1:52           ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27  7:50             ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27  9:41               ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 10:12                 ` Leslie P. Polzer
2008-10-27 10:14                 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 12:48                   ` Jakub Narebski
     [not found]                     ` <200810271512.26352.arne_bab@web.de>
2008-10-27 18:01                       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 20:48                         ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-27 21:07                           ` Miklos Vajna [this message]
2008-10-27 21:30                             ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-28  0:13                               ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-28 17:48                               ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-28 19:11                                 ` Arne Babenhauserheide
2008-10-28 19:38                                   ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-11-06 16:25                                     ` Marcin Kasperski
2008-11-06 17:41                                       ` Isaac Jurado
2008-10-28 19:16                                 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2008-10-27 23:25                           ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27  9:29             ` Benoit Boissinot
2008-10-27 10:57               ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-27 14:29                 ` 0000 vk
2008-10-27 14:57                   ` Jakub Narebski
     [not found]             ` <1225100597.31813.11.camel@abelardo.lan>
2008-10-27 11:42               ` David Soria Parra
2008-10-27 20:07             ` Brandon Casey
2008-10-27 20:37               ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-28  1:28                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-26 15:57   ` Felipe Contreras
2008-10-26 19:07     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-10-26 19:54       ` Felipe Contreras
2008-10-28 12:31 ` [VOTE] git versus mercurial walt
2008-10-28 14:28   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-28 14:41     ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) (was: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial) Peter Krefting
2008-10-28 14:59       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-28 15:02         ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) Matthieu Moy
2008-10-28 15:03       ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) (was: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial) Nicolas Pitre
2008-10-28 15:33       ` Pieter de Bie
2008-10-28 19:12         ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-28 21:10           ` Miklos Vajna
2008-10-28 21:31           ` Theodore Tso
2008-10-28 23:28             ` Miklos Vajna
2008-11-01  8:06             ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) Florian Weimer
2008-11-01 10:03               ` Santi Béjar
2008-11-01 10:33               ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01 10:44                 ` Florian Weimer
2008-11-01 11:10                   ` Florian Weimer
2008-11-01 12:26                   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-01 13:39                   ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-01 17:51                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-02  1:13                       ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-01 10:16         ` Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?) (was: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial) Peter Krefting
2008-10-29 19:11     ` [VOTE] git versus mercurial Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-29 19:36       ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
2008-10-29 19:48         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-29 19:51           ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
2008-10-29  8:15   ` Miles Bader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081027210716.GS2273@genesis.frugalware.org \
    --to=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
    --cc=SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com \
    --cc=arne_bab@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=mercurial@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).