From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SZEDER =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:38:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20081028193841.GA23637@neumann> References: <200810272230.51683.arne_bab@web.de> <4907506C.8090609@op5.se> <200810282011.40647.arne_bab@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Andreas Ericsson , Miklos Vajna , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org, mercurial@selenic.com, SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com To: Arne Babenhauserheide X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 28 20:40:56 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuuQr-0004Hs-Qq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:40:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753018AbYJ1TjJ convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:39:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752002AbYJ1TjJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:39:09 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:63393 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752058AbYJ1TjI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:39:08 -0400 Received: from [127.0.1.1] (p5B13377B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.19.55.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwh2-1KuuOv3RD9-0003Y1; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:38:53 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810282011.40647.arne_bab@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/rHy5KuhYsoebQY0uIN0eTOyCT26DMhfLeNh2 ududcnuHekk8Bn/ECjUrTdRxLFTrgXwHX2VCwSvJb8zcBG8uGV 5UIuZfYV4xUzZPmVEp0wQ== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 08:11:36PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > How many perl gurus have skipped writing > > stuff for hg because it's a "python-or-bust" thing? >=20 > How many Python people decided to write an extension for hg, because = it can=20 > very nicely be accessed via Python?=20 And wouldn't they contribute at all, if there would be hg bindings for other programming languages, would they? Best, G=E1bor