From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Using the --track option when creating a branch Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:23:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20081102042359.GC5261@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <18696.32778.842933.486171@lisa.zopyra.com> <1225343538.10803.9.camel@maia.lan> <18697.41702.241183.408377@lisa.zopyra.com> <18697.42140.459170.891195@lisa.zopyra.com> <4909A7C4.30507@op5.se> <2008-10-30-14-52-52+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Andreas Ericsson , Bill Lear , git@vger.kernel.org To: Samuel Tardieu X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 02 05:25:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KwUWe-0007Xp-6m for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:25:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751467AbYKBEYH (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:24:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751434AbYKBEYF (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:24:05 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:2244 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750902AbYKBEYE (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:24:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 22465 invoked by uid 111); 2 Nov 2008 04:24:01 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:24:00 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:23:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2008-10-30-14-52-52+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:52:52PM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote: > The current behaviour made me remove the branches I was not actively > on locally, because I would get errors from "git push" all the time > saying that I was not up-to-date in those branches. Not triggering an error on these branches has been discussed a few times before, but I'm not sure we ever reached a conclusion of what the ideal behavior would be. Try this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/85469 which points to a few others. Comments welcome. -Peff