From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add a planning document for the next CLI revamp Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:59:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20081103065941.GA10961@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20081030002239.D453B21D14E@mail.utsl.gen.nz> <20081031003154.GA5745@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v3ai9226q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20081103065636.GB10772@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Sam Vilain , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Scott Chacon , Tom Preston-Werner , "J.H." , Christian Couder , Kai Blin To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 03 08:01:15 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KwtR2-0001xW-9j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:01:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751995AbYKCG7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:59:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752067AbYKCG7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:59:44 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:4679 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751942AbYKCG7n (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:59:43 -0500 Received: (qmail 29180 invoked by uid 111); 3 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:59:43 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:59:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081103065636.GB10772@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:56:36AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > So my statement was not anything about "git push $there HEAD", but just > that adding "--matching" was reasonable. And btw, I am not saying I necessarily disagree with Sam's proposal about bare "git push". I am undecided about the best course of action there. I just wanted to make clear that it was not what I was talking about in the original mail. -Peff