From: Francis Galiegue <fg@one2team.net>
To: "Alexander Gavrilov" <angavrilov@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gitweb: Support filtering projects by .htaccess files.
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:45:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811031845.46451.fg@one2team.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb6f213e0811030926n32c1befcj5d9add6378f7dce4@mail.gmail.com>
Le Monday 03 November 2008 18:26:44 Alexander Gavrilov, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Francis Galiegue <fg@one2team.net> wrote:
> > It just seems to me that this is emulating functionality that multiple Web servers already provide...
> >
> > What's more, knowledge about these Web servers are _much_ more widespread than knowledge about gitweb.
> >
> > Why reinvent the wheel?
>
> If you are speaking of web servers as in 'GitHub', then it is
> irrelevant, because its server software is nonfree.
>
I didn't even account for these.
> If you are speaking of web servers as in 'Apache', then how would it
> know which files are going to be accessed when it executes
> cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=very/private/project.git to check permissions?
>
Well, as far as Apache is concerned, it can do:
* basic .htpasswd authentication,
* LDAP,
* PAM,
* SSL certificate check (via mod_ssl),
* probably others.
Plenty of possibilities.
Well, that's just mho. But if ever I complete my current work on
git-cvsimport (or using git2(svn|git)), I'll go for option 2: my LDAP
database has all the info, and Apache knows about Cache-Control, not
gitweb...
NOTE: I'm just saying here that your patch is of no use as far as _I_
am concerned. I'm basically saying that git cannot account for all
authentication schemes out there. Neither can Apache, but it supports a
buckload of them already.
--
fge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-03 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-03 16:43 [RFC PATCH] gitweb: Support filtering projects by .htaccess files Alexander Gavrilov
2008-11-03 16:54 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-03 17:26 ` Alexander Gavrilov
2008-11-03 17:45 ` Francis Galiegue [this message]
2008-11-03 18:18 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-03 18:44 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-03 19:17 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-03 21:59 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-04 0:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-04 7:42 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-03 22:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-05 22:36 ` Alexander Gavrilov
2008-11-05 23:26 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-06 19:43 ` Alexander Gavrilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811031845.46451.fg@one2team.net \
--to=fg@one2team.net \
--cc=angavrilov@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox