Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francis Galiegue <fg@one2team.net>
To: "Alexander Gavrilov" <angavrilov@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gitweb: Support filtering projects by .htaccess files.
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:45:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811031845.46451.fg@one2team.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb6f213e0811030926n32c1befcj5d9add6378f7dce4@mail.gmail.com>

Le Monday 03 November 2008 18:26:44 Alexander Gavrilov, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Francis Galiegue <fg@one2team.net> wrote:
> > It just seems to me that this is emulating functionality that multiple Web servers already provide...
> >
> > What's more, knowledge about these Web servers are _much_ more widespread than knowledge about gitweb.
> >
> > Why reinvent the wheel?
> 
> If you are speaking of web servers as in 'GitHub', then it is
> irrelevant, because its server software is nonfree.
> 

I didn't even account for these.

> If you are speaking of web servers as in 'Apache', then how would it
> know which files are going to be accessed when it executes
> cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=very/private/project.git to check permissions?
> 

Well, as far as Apache is concerned, it can do:

* basic .htpasswd authentication,
* LDAP,
* PAM,
* SSL certificate check (via mod_ssl),
* probably others.

Plenty of possibilities.

Well, that's just mho. But if ever I complete my current work on
git-cvsimport (or using git2(svn|git)), I'll go for option 2: my LDAP
database has all the info, and Apache knows about Cache-Control, not
gitweb...

NOTE: I'm just saying here that your patch is of no use as far as _I_
am concerned. I'm basically saying that git cannot account for all
authentication schemes out there. Neither can Apache, but it supports a
buckload of them already.

-- 
fge

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-03 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-03 16:43 [RFC PATCH] gitweb: Support filtering projects by .htaccess files Alexander Gavrilov
2008-11-03 16:54 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-03 17:26   ` Alexander Gavrilov
2008-11-03 17:45     ` Francis Galiegue [this message]
2008-11-03 18:18       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-03 18:44         ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-03 19:17           ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-03 21:59             ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-04  0:24               ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-04  7:42                 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-03 22:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-05 22:36   ` Alexander Gavrilov
2008-11-05 23:26     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-11-06 19:43       ` Alexander Gavrilov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200811031845.46451.fg@one2team.net \
    --to=fg@one2team.net \
    --cc=angavrilov@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox