From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] push: fix local refs update if already up-to-date Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:44:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20081105224450.GA20440@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20081104000745.GA28480@localhost> <20081104042643.GA31276@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20081104085630.GA22530@localhost> <20081105024932.GA20907@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20081105202849.GA9484@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Clemens Buchacher X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 05 23:46:10 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kxr8a-0004Vo-0M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:46:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753682AbYKEWox (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:44:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752498AbYKEWox (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:44:53 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:1728 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752464AbYKEWox (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:44:53 -0500 Received: (qmail 17139 invoked by uid 111); 5 Nov 2008 22:44:52 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:44:52 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:44:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081105202849.GA9484@localhost> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:28:49PM +0100, Clemens Buchacher wrote: > The reason it doesn't work is a bug in lock_ref_sha1_basic(). Dating back to > pre-"pack-refs" times, this code forces a write if the ref file does not > exist. I will resubmit the patch including your above testcase and a bugfix > for lock_ref_sha1_basic(). OK, thanks for looking into it further. Both patches look sane to me. -Peff