From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: Newbie questions regarding jgit Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:11:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20081111231106.GT2932@spearce.org> References: <4919EECB.7070408@wellfleetsoftware.com> <2c6b72b30811111337v2fe23c75v25251838f721a007@mail.gmail.com> <20081111214434.GS2932@spearce.org> <2c6b72b30811111401i3c995889n54407243a1072599@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Farrukh Najmi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonas Fonseca X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 12 00:12:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L02PM-0001PJ-JX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:12:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751590AbYKKXLK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:11:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751582AbYKKXLJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:11:09 -0500 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:36416 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751006AbYKKXLI (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:11:08 -0500 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CF676381FF; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2c6b72b30811111401i3c995889n54407243a1072599@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonas Fonseca wrote: > > I don't think admin rights are necessary as long as I have > "commit"/webdav access. And no svn or git-svn interaction should be > needed to upload to the maven repository. > > Take a look at the distributionManagement section of the > google-maven-repository: > > - http://google-maven-repository.googlecode.com/svn/repository/com/google/google/1/google-1.pom > > Looks pretty easy to set up. About maintaining it, I don't mind doing > "mvn deploy" once in a while, but some kind of update policy should > probably be worked out in any case. Then have at it. It sounds like it would be worthwhile setting up. -- Shawn.