From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Brown <git@davidb.org>
Subject: Re: Extra pair of double quotes in "git commit" output?
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:15:42 -0800
Message-ID: <20081126171540.GA21540@linode.davidb.org>
References: <20081126064906.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <20081125232521.GC30942@coredump.intra.peff.net> <adf1fd3d0811251606t7f49eb84y53075427859bd26a@mail.gmail.com> <20081126133422.GA1761@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Cc: Santi =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9jar?= <santi@agolina.net>,
	Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 26 18:17:57 2008
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1L5O16-0001um-CK
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:17:32 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754817AbYKZRPs (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:15:48 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753053AbYKZRPs
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:15:48 -0500
Received: from linode.davidb.org ([72.14.176.16]:51298 "EHLO mail.davidb.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754809AbYKZRPr (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:15:47 -0500
Received: from davidb by mail.davidb.org with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian))
	id 1L5NzK-0005d4-DP; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:15:42 -0800
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081126133422.GA1761@coredump.intra.peff.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/101749>

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:34:23AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

>> or to make the separation more evident:
>> 
>> [master d9a5491] foo: bar
>
>Out of those suggestions, I find only the final one aesthetically
>acceptable. Nobody else has weighed in, so maybe they don't care. Or
>maybe they are just on vacation due to the (American) holiday.

Color certainly works well in the cases where that is available.
Otherwise, I prefer the above solution.

David