From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fredrik Skolmli Subject: Re: gitweb doesn't work with bare repositories Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:01:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20081130000115.GB20403@frsk.net> References: <4931D23A.10402@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Evgeniy Ivanov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 30 01:02:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L6Zlk-0002Tq-7V for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:02:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753124AbYK3ABU (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:01:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753272AbYK3ABU (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:01:20 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19]:39406 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752915AbYK3ABT (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:01:19 -0500 Received: from asterix.samfundet.no ([2001:700:300:1800::f] helo=asterix.frsk.net ident=Debian-exim) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L6ZkT-0001bj-Br; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:01:17 +0100 Received: from fredrik by asterix.frsk.net with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L6ZkS-0003HV-Uy; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:01:16 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4931D23A.10402@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 02:37:30AM +0300, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > Hi, Hi. Just checking now, but are the following corrections right? > In projects I have created bare repo: > mkdir some mkdir some.git > cd some.git > git --bare init > cd /some_git_repo > git push /srv/www/gamekeeper/htdocs/projects master git push /srv/www/gamekeeper/htdocs/projects/some.git master > Permissions are ok, virtual host is ok since I get main page and have > access to cloned repo. You're sure the user the webserver is running as has access to the repo as well? - Fredrik -- Kind regards, Fredrik Skolmli