From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: Saving patches from this list Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:14:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20081212151419.GL32487@spearce.org> References: <49421AEE.8090902@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt , Junio C Hamano To: Mike Ralphson , Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E4we?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 12 16:15:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LB9ju-0004bG-6t for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:15:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756698AbYLLPOV convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:14:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756767AbYLLPOU (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:14:20 -0500 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:41777 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754930AbYLLPOU (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:14:20 -0500 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 50A2E38200; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mike Ralphson wrote: > 2008/12/12 Stefan N=E4we > > > Stefan N=E4we schrieb: > > > > What's the best way to get patches sent to this list in a form = suitable > > > > for 'git am' without subscribing to this list ? If you find the article on the web with gmane, add '/raw' onto the end of direct link URL. E.g. to get: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/102874 use: curl http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/102874/r= aw | git am=20 =20 > Junio's blog[1] shows he's looking at patchwork. Personally I think i= t > would be fantastic to have a public patchwork server available. It > might avoid the chicken and egg problem in that it's currently easier > (for some people) to get hold of a patch to play with / review only > after it's accepted. One of the things I want to do with Gerrit 2 is teach it to read a mailing list and convert patches it receives into temporary branches that can be fetched over git://, and also create records in its web database so reviews can be done on the web interface, then let it CC the list back with a proper In-Reply-To when comments are posted on the web to a change it received by email. IOW, I want to make Gerrit 2 useful to the git community to monitor patch state without changing our current email based workflow. But I'm still a good two or three months from being able to do that. Android's workflow is higher priority to me right now. --=20 Shawn.