From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2008, #02; Sun, 14) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:15:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20081214131508.GA5691@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <7v7i632mg9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dgVgbXf0Vb2tUvlQ" Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 14 14:16:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBqpg-0007CX-NJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:16:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752962AbYLNNPL (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:15:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752905AbYLNNPL (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:15:11 -0500 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([212.40.97.103]:48142 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752835AbYLNNPK (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:15:10 -0500 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F235658091; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:15:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45164465E; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:15:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 11C6D11B887E; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:15:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --dgVgbXf0Vb2tUvlQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:17:05AM -0800, Jakub Narebski = wrote: > So the answer is that AsciiDoc does not generate LaTeX, so pdflatex > would be not enough. >=20 > By the way, from the AsciiDoc page: >=20 > NOTE: Owning to to other commitments, Benjamin is unable to maintain > this backend. I don't have the expertise or time to take this > on consequently the LaTeX backend has not been tested or > updated since AsciiDoc version 8.2.7 and is currently > unsupported. Yes, this is the LaTeX backend, which would allow not to use dblatex, but generate tex directly from asciidoc. That's why my patch uses dblatex instead. --dgVgbXf0Vb2tUvlQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklFBtsACgkQe81tAgORUJYRPwCgl7ID8kCBT/+mmsBJlxXW54L2 fNQAoJbV2+iz4DNetVn5EeBSO1oHeQiU =Y2/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dgVgbXf0Vb2tUvlQ--