git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH try 2] gitweb: Add option to put a trailing slash on pathinfo-style project URLs
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:20:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812150020.53370.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229219030.3360.44.camel@mattlaptop2.local>

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:47 -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> >
> > Errr... I see that it adds trailing slash only for project-only
> > path_info links, but the commit message was not entirely clear for me.
> 
> I will clarify the message.

It would be nice (e.g. to have example URL with trailing slash ensured).

[...]
> > > @@ -829,8 +834,8 @@ sub href (%) {
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	my $use_pathinfo = gitweb_check_feature('pathinfo');
> > > -	if ($use_pathinfo) {
> > > +	my @use_pathinfo = gitweb_get_feature('pathinfo');
> > 
> > Why not name those variables for better readability?
> > 
> > +       my ($use_pathinfo, $trailing_slash) = gitweb_get_feature('pathinfo');
> 
> I'll do that.

Note that you wouldn't need that if you decide that it makes sense
(and doesn't have disadvantages) to *always* add trailing slash to
the end of path_info for some kinds of gitweb links.

> > > +	if ($use_pathinfo[0]) {
> > >  		# try to put as many parameters as possible in PATH_INFO:
> > >  		#   - project name
> > >  		#   - action
> > > @@ -845,7 +850,12 @@ sub href (%) {
> > >  		$href =~ s,/$,,;
> > >  
> > >  		# Then add the project name, if present
> > > -		$href .= "/".esc_url($params{'project'}) if defined $params{'project'};
> > > +		my $proj_href = undef;
> > > +		if (defined $params{'project'}) {
> > > +			$href .= "/".esc_url($params{'project'});
> > > +			# Save for trailing-slash check below.
> > > +			$proj_href = $href;
> > > +		}
> > >  		delete $params{'project'};
> > >  
> > >  		# since we destructively absorb parameters, we keep this
> > > @@ -903,6 +913,10 @@ sub href (%) {
> > >  			$href .= $known_snapshot_formats{$fmt}{'suffix'};
> > >  			delete $params{'snapshot_format'};
> > >  		}
> > > +
> > > +		# If requested in the configuration, add a trailing slash to a URL that
> > > +		# has nothing appended after the project path.
> > > +		$href .= '/' if ($use_pathinfo[1] && defined $proj_href && $href eq $proj_href);
> > >  	}
> > 
> > The check _feels_ inefficient.  I think (but feel free to disagree) that
> > it would be better to use something like $project_pathinfo, set it
> > when adding project as pathinfo, and unset if we add anything else as
> > pathinfo.
> 
> I considered doing that, but I decided that not having to litter the
> preceding code with manipulation of $project_pathinfo outweighed
> whatever negligible performance difference there might be.

On the other hand, with having boolean variable named for example
$trailing_slash or $add_trailing_slash, you can set it to appropriate
value by default (should project list URL: http://example.com/ have
trailing slash), and at [almost] each 'delete $params{<param>}' either
set it to true, or set it to false. This way it would be easy to
extend to have trailing slash also for example for OPML link
http://example.com/opml/ or not have it and use http://example.com/opml

I think it is not only more efficient, but is also more flexible.
Admittedly it is also more complicated...
 
> > > +		if ($use_pathinfo[0]) {
> > >  			$action .= "/".esc_url($project);
> > > +			# Add a trailing slash if requested in the configuration.
> > > +			$action .= '/' if ($use_pathinfo[1]);
> > 
> > Hmmm... let me check something... you rely on the fact that $project
> > doesn't end with slash, while I think (but please check it) that it
> > can end with slash if it is provided by CGI query.
> 
> You are right; in fact, this is already a problem for the strict_export
> check.  Gitweb should probably strip trailing slashes when it reads the
> "p" parameter.  I will submit a separate patch for that.

That would be nice. TIA.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-14 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-13 19:10 [PATCH] gitweb: Add option to put a trailing slash on pathinfo-style project URLs Matt McCutchen
2008-12-13 21:11 ` [PATCH try 2] " Matt McCutchen
2008-12-13 21:47   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-13 22:23     ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2008-12-14  1:13       ` Matt McCutchen
2008-12-14 23:39         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-14 23:55           ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-13 22:37     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-14  1:43     ` Matt McCutchen
2008-12-14 23:20       ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-12-14 23:58         ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812150020.53370.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=matt@mattmccutchen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).