From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>,
	Bruce Stephens <bruce.stephens@isode.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:56:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081215155610.GA11502@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081215140834.GA3684@atjola.homenet>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:08:34PM +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> To clarify that a bit more: git gc keeps unreachable objects unpacked,
> so that git prune can drop them. And git gc invokes git prune so that
> only unreachable objects older than 2 weeks are dropped.
To be even more explicit, "git gc" will **unpack** objects that have
become unreachable and were currently in packs.  As a result, the
amount of disk space used by a git repository can actually go **up**
dramatically after a "git gc" operation, which could be surprising for
someone who is running close to full on their filesystem, deletes a
number of branches from a tracking repository, and then does a "git
gc" may get a very unpleasant surprise.
A really good repository which shows this is linux-next, since it is
constantly getting rewound, and old branches are reserved via a tag
such as next-20081204.  If you update the your local copy of the
linux-next repository every day, you will accumulate a large number of
these old branch tags.  If you then delete a whole series of them, and
run git-gc, the operation will take quite a while, and the number of
blocks and inodes used will grow significantly.  They will disappear
after a "git prune", but when I do this housekeeping operation, I've
often wished for a --yes-I-know-what-I-am-doing-and-it's-unsafe-but-
just-drop-the-unreachable-objects-cause-this-is-just-a-tracking-repository
option to "git gc".
						- Ted
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-15 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-15 12:52 "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 13:38 ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 14:08   ` Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 14:08   ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-12-15 15:56     ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-12-15 16:12       ` Mark Brown
2008-12-15 16:59         ` Johan Herland
2008-12-15 16:59         ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 17:07       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-15 19:38         ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-15 17:11       ` Brandon Casey
2008-12-15 17:38       ` [PATCH] objects to be pruned immediately don't have to be loosened Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081215155610.GA11502@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=bruce.stephens@isode.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikachu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).