git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
	Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>,
	Bruce Stephens <bruce.stephens@isode.com>
Subject: Re: "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:59:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812151759.44420.johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081215161212.GE31145@sirena.org.uk>

On Monday 15 December 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:08:34PM +0100, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote:
> > > To clarify that a bit more: git gc keeps unreachable objects
> > > unpacked, so that git prune can drop them. And git gc invokes git
> > > prune so that only unreachable objects older than 2 weeks are
> > > dropped.
> >
> > To be even more explicit, "git gc" will **unpack** objects that
> > have become unreachable and were currently in packs.  As a result,
> > the amount of disk space used by a git repository can actually go
> > **up** dramatically after a "git gc" operation, which could be
> > surprising for someone who is running close to full on their
> > filesystem, deletes a number of branches from a tracking
> > repository, and then does a "git gc" may get a very unpleasant
> > surprise.
>
> It can also cause things like the "please repack" warning in git gui
> to go off.  This is especially unhelpful since they tend to tell you
> to go and do a gc to resolve the problem.

Instead of exploding all unreachable objects into loose objects, does it 
make sense to repack them into a separate pack? AFAICS, that would 
solve both the disk usage problem and the git-gui-"please repack" 
problem. Also, it might make git-prune's job much easier, since 
unreachable objects are now located in a single pack only?


Have fun!

...Johan

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-15 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-15 12:52 "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 13:38 ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 14:08   ` Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 14:08   ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-12-15 15:56     ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-15 16:12       ` Mark Brown
2008-12-15 16:59         ` Johan Herland [this message]
2008-12-15 16:59         ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 17:07       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-15 19:38         ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-15 17:11       ` Brandon Casey
2008-12-15 17:38       ` [PATCH] objects to be pruned immediately don't have to be loosened Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812151759.44420.johan@herland.net \
    --to=johan@herland.net \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
    --cc=bruce.stephens@isode.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikachu@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).