From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git log --numstat disagrees with git apply --numstat Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:32:26 -0500 Message-ID: <20081215203225.GA19964@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20081211235337.GK32487@spearce.org> <20081212015254.GA23128@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20081212020857.GB23128@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20081212022156.GC23128@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vhc55yd58.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 15 21:34:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LCK8b-0001D3-1D for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:33:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753241AbYLOUce (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:32:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753068AbYLOUcd (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:32:33 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:4775 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752791AbYLOUcd (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:32:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 8126 invoked by uid 111); 15 Dec 2008 20:32:32 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:32:32 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:32:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vhc55yd58.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:57:07AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > BTW, I got a little confused looking at the parameters to xdi_diff_outf, > > since ecb gets passed in full of random garbage. I don't know if this > > cleanup is worth applying: > > I think this makes sense, but let's do this after 1.6.1 final. It does > not fix anything, and I'd rather avoid distraction. Agreed. I will re-post both patches after 1.6.1 is released. -Peff