git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 (edit v2)] gitweb: Cache $parent_commit info in git_blame()
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:19:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081217081935.GC3640@machine.or.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812110133.33124.jnareb@gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:33:29AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Luben Tuikov changed 'lineno' link from leading to commit which gave
> current version of given block of lines, to leading to parent of this
> commit in 244a70e (Blame "linenr" link jumps to previous state at
> "orig_lineno").  This made possible data mining using 'blame' view.
> 
> The current implementation calls rev-parse once per each blamed line
> to find parent revision of blamed commit, even when the same commit
> appears more than once, which is inefficient.
> 
> This patch attempts to mitigate this issue by storing (caching)
> $parent_commit info in %metainfo, which makes gitweb call
> git-rev-parse only once per each unique commit in blame output.
> 
> 
> In the tables below you can see simple benchmark comparing gitweb
> performance before and after this patch
> 
> File               | L[1] | C[2] || Time0[3] | Before[4] | After[4]
> ====================================================================
> blob.h             |   18 |    4 || 0m1.727s |  0m2.545s |  0m2.474s
> GIT-VERSION-GEN    |   42 |   13 || 0m2.165s |  0m2.448s |  0m2.071s
> README             |   46 |    6 || 0m1.593s |  0m2.727s |  0m2.242s
> revision.c         | 1923 |  121 || 0m2.357s | 0m30.365s |  0m7.028s
> gitweb/gitweb.perl | 6291 |  428 || 0m8.080s | 1m37.244s | 0m20.627s
> 
> File               | L/C  | Before/After
> =========================================
> blob.h             |  4.5 |         1.03
> GIT-VERSION-GEN    |  3.2 |         1.18
> README             |  7.7 |         1.22
> revision.c         | 15.9 |         4.32
> gitweb/gitweb.perl | 14.7 |         4.71
> 
> As you can see the greater ratio of lines in file to unique commits
> in blame output, the greater gain from the new implementation.
> 
> Footnotes:
> ~~~~~~~~~~
> [1] Lines:
>     $ wc -l <file>
> [2] Individual commits in blame output:
>     $ git blame -p <file> | grep author-time | wc -l
> [3] Time for running "git blame -p" (user time, single run):
>     $ time git blame -p <file> >/dev/null
> [4] Time to run gitweb as Perl script from command line:
>     $ gitweb-run.sh "p=.git;a=blame;f=<file>" > /dev/null 2>&1
> 
> The gitweb-run.sh script includes slightly modified (with adjusted
> pathnames) code from gitweb_run() function from the test script
> t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh; gitweb config file
> gitweb_config.perl contents (again up to adjusting pathnames; in
> particular $projectroot variable should point to top directory of git
> repository) can be found in the same place.
> 
> 
> Alternate solutions:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Alternate solution would be to open bidi pipe to "git cat-file
> --batch-check", (like in Git::Repo in gitweb caching by Lea Wiemann),
> feed $long_rev^ to it, and parse its output which has the following
> form:
> 
>   926b07e694599d86cec668475071b32147c95034 commit 637
> 
> This would mean one call to git-cat-file for the whole 'blame' view,
> instead of one call to git-rev-parse per each unique commit in blame
> output.
> 
> 
> Yet another solution would be to change use of validate_refname() to
> validate_revision() when checking script parameters (CGI query or
> path_info), with validate_revision being something like the following:
> 
>   sub validate_revision {
>         my $rev = shift;
>         return validate_refname(strip_rev_suffixes($rev));
>   }
> 
> so we don't need to calculate $long_rev^, but can pass "$long_rev^" as
> 'hb' parameter.
> 
> This solution has the advantage that it can be easily adapted to
> future incremental blame output.
> 
> Acked-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>

(though I think the commit message is total overkill for such an obvious
change ;-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-17  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-09 22:43 [PATCH 0/3] gitweb: Improve git_blame in preparation for incremental blame Jakub Narebski
2008-12-09 22:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] gitweb: Move 'lineno' id from link to row element in git_blame Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10  5:55   ` Luben Tuikov
2008-12-17  8:13   ` Petr Baudis
2008-12-09 22:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] gitweb: Cache $parent_commit info in git_blame() Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10  3:49   ` Nanako Shiraishi
2008-12-10 13:39     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10 20:27       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-11  0:33         ` [PATCH 2/3 (edit v2)] " Jakub Narebski
2008-12-11  4:08           ` Luben Tuikov
2008-12-11  4:18             ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-12  3:05           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-12 17:20             ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-17  8:19           ` Petr Baudis [this message]
2008-12-17  8:34             ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-10  6:20   ` [PATCH 2/3] " Luben Tuikov
2008-12-10 15:15     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10 20:05       ` Luben Tuikov
2008-12-10 21:03         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10 21:15           ` Luben Tuikov
2008-12-09 22:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: A bit of code cleanup " Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10  2:13   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-10  8:35     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-10  6:24   ` Luben Tuikov
2008-12-10 20:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/3] gitweb: Incremental blame (proof of concept) Jakub Narebski
2008-12-11  0:47   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-11  1:22     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-11 17:28   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-11 22:34     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-14  0:17   ` [RFC/PATCH v2] " Jakub Narebski
2008-12-14 16:11     ` [RFC] gitweb: Incremental blame - suggestions for improvements Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081217081935.GC3640@machine.or.cz \
    --to=pasky@suse.cz \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
    --cc=nanako3@lavabit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).