From: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
To: "Tim Visher" <tim.visher@gmail.com>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to roll back unstaged changes while leaving the staged ones for the next commit?
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:34:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081218123456.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c115fd3c0812171722g93dbeefw2fb5bf7641dfe394@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting "Tim Visher" <tim.visher@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> How about omitting the "git commit" and do "git checkout PATH" after you
>> are done with the staging? IOW, (1) above.
>
> Huh. I guess I was under the impression that doing the `git checkout
> PATH` would destroy the staged content as well as the unstaged. This
> isn't the case?
A short answer is "no it is not the case."
I was about to quote "git checkout" documentation to you because I was reasonably sure that Junio won't respond to people who ask a question whose answer is plainly described in the manual pages, but I think the description of the command is a little confusing especially for people who read it for the first time.
This is a patch to clarify the sentence.
-- 8< -- Cut Here -- 8< --
Subject: Clarify documentation of "git checkout <tree-ish> paths" syntax
The SYNOPSIS section of the manual writes:
git checkout [options] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
but the DESCRIPTION says that this form checks the paths out "from the
index, or from a named commit." A later sentence refers to the same
argument as "<tree-ish> argument", but it is not clear that these two
sentences are talking about the same command line argument for first-time
readers.
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
---
Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
index 168333a..bbdfa40 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ the first namespace level.
When <paths> are given, this command does *not* switch
branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree from
-the index file, or from a named commit. In
+the index file, or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a commit). In
this case, the `-b` options is meaningless and giving
either of them results in an error. <tree-ish> argument can be
used to specify a specific tree-ish (i.e. commit, tag or tree)
--
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-17 19:57 Is it possible to roll back unstaged changes while leaving the staged ones for the next commit? Tim Visher
2008-12-17 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-17 22:48 ` Tim Visher
2008-12-17 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-18 1:22 ` Tim Visher
2008-12-18 3:34 ` Nanako Shiraishi [this message]
2008-12-18 12:24 ` Tim Visher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081218123456.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com \
--to=nanako3@lavabit.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=tim.visher@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).