From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Haberman Subject: Re: [announce] gc Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:23:22 -0600 Organization: Exigence Message-ID: <20081225092322.da6930c2.stephen@exigencecorp.com> References: <20081222212407.47c9ab1e.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <20081223082207.f31ab2a3.stephen@exigencecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Matthieu Moy" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Mike Ralphson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 25 16:25:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LFs54-0000VH-0k for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:24:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751845AbYLYPXj (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:23:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751913AbYLYPXj (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:23:39 -0500 Received: from smtp122.sat.emailsrvr.com ([66.216.121.122]:35928 "EHLO smtp122.sat.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621AbYLYPXi (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:23:38 -0500 Received: from relay2.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay2.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 11003CF613; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:23:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by relay2.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: stephen-AT-exigencecorp.com) with ESMTPSA id 9B0AAC49CB; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:23:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > I'm a little cautious about using words like corporate/enterprise as > > there is nothing exclusively "corporate/enterprise" about any of the > > hooks in the project, we just happened to be on a corporate/enterprise > > project when we came up with them. > > As the workflows these seem to support are centralised (as you say > these apply equally well in some non-corporate / enterprise projects), > how about git-central? Ah, that's excellent. Thanks for the suggestion. - Stephen