git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Petr Baudis" <pasky@suse.cz>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: suggest name for OPML view
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901102045.57589.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb7bb73a0901101115i541f0911o42f08fc47820fb82@mail.gmail.com>

Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>>
>>> Suggest opml.xml as name for OPML view by providing the appropriate
>>> header, consistently with similar usage in project_index view.
>>
>> It is not name for a view, but more of default filename when saving
>> it. While it is good idea to have consistency, I guess that while
>> 'project_index' view and other non-HTML views are meant to be
>> downloaded and saved (snapshots, patches, patchsets), OPML view
>> is meant to be used on-line, just like web feeds in RSS and Atom
>> formats which are non-HTML too but do not have Content-Disposition
>> header set.
> 
> OPML is used for import/export of RSS feed lists between aggregators
> (e.g. moving your reading list from knewsreader to google reader). As
> such, it can also be comfortable to save it to disk for import by some
> tools. IMO, of course. [...]

If it is used in such way, then I am all for it (and of course for
consistency with 'projects_index' view).

Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

      reply	other threads:[~2009-01-10 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-02 12:49 [PATCH] gitweb: suggest name for OPML view Giuseppe Bilotta
2009-01-06  8:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-10 14:10 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-01-10 19:15   ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2009-01-10 19:45     ` Jakub Narebski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901102045.57589.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=pasky@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).