From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Roeland Subject: Re: Recent annoying problem with Linus's git repository? Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:29:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20090112082942.GC29673@fiberbit.xs4all.nl> References: <20090112075942.GB29673@fiberbit.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk To: walt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 12 09:44:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LMIOv-0001ds-5p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:44:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751858AbZALImh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:42:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751378AbZALImh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:42:37 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.33]:1654 "EHLO smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243AbZALImh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:42:37 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 769 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:42:36 EST Received: from fiberbit.xs4all.nl (fiberbit.xs4all.nl [80.101.187.211]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0C8TglG057592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:29:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marco.roeland@xs4all.nl) Received: from marco by fiberbit.xs4all.nl with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LMIB4-0000gM-92; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:29:42 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090112075942.GB29673@fiberbit.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Monday January 12th 2009 at 08:59 Marco Roeland wrote: > The file should probably just be really deleted. Adding Russell to the > Cc. ;-) Andrew Price already reported the issue and sent a patch last Wednesday: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123134235028543&w=2 -- Marco Roeland, who should check all his mailing lists before answering