From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: Compiler requirements for git? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:38:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20090114223832.GC30710@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <128172e70901141032p6e830a85i344d72e1b3bb3a89@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wqJr86X7F8PBspU2" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Corey Stup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 14 23:40:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNEP0-0005yn-B9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:39:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758650AbZANWig (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:38:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755625AbZANWif (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:38:35 -0500 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([212.40.97.103]:50294 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755596AbZANWie (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:38:34 -0500 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D8258172; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:38:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85564465E; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:38:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A41711B8630; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:38:32 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <128172e70901141032p6e830a85i344d72e1b3bb3a89@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --wqJr86X7F8PBspU2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:32:56PM -0500, Corey Stup wrote: > When trying to compile with a C89 compliant compiler, I'm coming > across a couple issues: > - "inline" use AFAIK that can be avoided with -Dinline=. --wqJr86X7F8PBspU2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkluaWgACgkQe81tAgORUJaPAgCgj+WLQPjkvWnbTdIx+yQVcOvp kCcAoKmaFlIitYWbKgtntedPbhXEee/d =JEOa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wqJr86X7F8PBspU2--