From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [PATCH take 3 0/4] color-words improvements Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:11:32 +0100 Message-ID: <200901142311.37342.trast@student.ethz.ch> References: <200901142059.09005.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart88001939.kMxFpJkXoA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Teemu Likonen , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Santi =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A9jar?= To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 14 23:13:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNDyk-0003EC-IP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:12:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755590AbZANWLX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:11:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755555AbZANWLX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:11:23 -0500 Received: from xsmtp0.ethz.ch ([82.130.70.14]:12982 "EHLO XSMTP0.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754519AbZANWLW (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:11:22 -0500 Received: from xfe0.d.ethz.ch ([82.130.124.40]) by XSMTP0.ethz.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:11:20 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([84.75.148.62]) by xfe0.d.ethz.ch over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:11:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2009 22:11:20.0540 (UTC) FILETIME=[078919C0:01C97695] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --nextPart88001939.kMxFpJkXoA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Which reminds me... should we activate REG_EXTENDED by default? We (you :-) do, and I think so. Consider that funcname is not even documented any more, in favour of xfuncname. =2D-=20 Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch --nextPart88001939.kMxFpJkXoA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkluYxkACgkQqUud07tmzP2AmACfU8AGWyNUcxehCeqwhPFucnQw 6yUAn1K64SY0LLop7V6H6AQzYyJ+SQB/ =O8i9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart88001939.kMxFpJkXoA--