From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: Re: rebase -p confusion in 1.6.1 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:55:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20090115135518.GB10045@leksak.fem-net> References: <496F3C99.1040800@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sitaram Chamarty , git@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Haberman To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 15 14:56:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNSiH-0000mO-J6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:56:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755412AbZAONzY (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:55:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755133AbZAONzX (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:55:23 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33702 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754960AbZAONzW (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:55:22 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2009 13:55:21 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 15 Jan 2009 14:55:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Hba02fDeHKTOdK1sBfyHU6oTvviRNw1HPNk6mbM giVz3cPbPmn+gU Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LNSgo-000510-TO; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:55:18 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496F3C99.1040800@drmicha.warpmail.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, > First of all: git 1.6.0.6 gives you the unchanged graph after using > rebase -i -p. This is true and it is a far better behavior than now, but I think it's not the expected behavior. (I have written about the behavior I'd expect in another reply to the original mail.) Also git rebase -i -p master should do the same as git rebase -i -p --onto master master or am I wrong? But the latter does $ git rebase --onto master -i -p master fatal: Needed a single revision Invalid base instead of resulting in an unchanged graph. (Tested with 1.5.6.5, the only other version I have installed besides my master branch) Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer , PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F