From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Make the rebase edit mode really end up in an edit state Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:58:06 +0100 Message-ID: <200901161158.06828.johan@herland.net> References: <87ab9th0rh.fsf@cup.kalibalik.dk> <200901161050.13971.johan@herland.net> <49548.bFoQE3daRhY=.1232101666.squirrel@webmail.hotelhot.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Jay Soffian" , "Wincent Colaiuta" , "Johannes Schindelin" , "Junio C Hamano" , "Sverre Rabbelier" , "Johannes Sixt" To: "Anders Melchiorsen" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 16 12:00:01 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNmQb-0004cK-OA for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:59:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756495AbZAPK63 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:58:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756903AbZAPK62 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:58:28 -0500 Received: from sam.opera.com ([213.236.208.81]:58738 "EHLO smtp.opera.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754314AbZAPK62 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:58:28 -0500 Received: from pc107.coreteam.oslo.opera.com (pat-tdc.opera.com [213.236.208.22]) by smtp.opera.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id n0GAw74R028859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:58:12 GMT User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <49548.bFoQE3daRhY=.1232101666.squirrel@webmail.hotelhot.dk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Friday 16 January 2009, Anders Melchiorsen wrote: > Johan Herland wrote: > > amend e8902c1 Foo > > > > does a "pick" followed by "commit --amend" (for editing the commit > > message), followed by "rebase --continue". > > I do not think that "amend" is the best word for editing only the > commit message. A "commit --amend" can also make a new tree, so > reusing the word with a different meaning could be bad. > > As for alternatives, however, I can only come up with "copyedit", and > that is so horrible that I will not even propose it :-) "rephrase"? ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net