From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= Subject: Confusing text in git-prune.txt Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:50:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20090116165013.GA14196@chistera.yi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 16 17:51:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNrv3-0004aA-38 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:51:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755232AbZAPQuU convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:50:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753071AbZAPQuR (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:50:17 -0500 Received: from 226.Red-80-25-139.staticIP.rima-tde.net ([80.25.139.226]:1033 "EHLO etc.inittab.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752448AbZAPQuP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:50:15 -0500 Received: from chistera.yi.org (unknown [192.168.254.34]) by etc.inittab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B9D801C0E0 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:50:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from userid 1000 by justin with local (Exim 4.69) id 1LNrtd-0003kW-CA for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:50:13 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: =46rom git-prune.txt: [...] prunes all unpacked objects unreachable from any of these head objects from the object database. In addition, it prunes the unpacked objects that are also found in packs by ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ running git-prune-packed. How can "unpacked objects" be "found in packs"? Maybe the first "unpacked" should be "unreachable". But if that's the case, wouldn't this be better: [...] prunes from the object database all objects unreachable from any of these heads. Prunning already-packed objects is done with the help of git-prune-packed. Thoughts? Or am I reading the original text wrong? --=20 Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 dato at net.com.= org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.or= g =20 I promise you. Once I enter into an exclusive relationship, I sleep wit= h very few people. -- Denny Crane