git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Julius Naperkowski <j.nap@gmx.de>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide pessimistic defaults for cross compilation tests.
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:59:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120065939.GC5561@ins.uni-bonn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vab9mpu8w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

* Junio C Hamano wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:49:03AM CET:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > How do you deal with the hardcoded limitation that uname_S is defined to 
> > be the output of "uname -s" on the _build_ system, and that quite a large 
> > part of the Makefile sets variables dependent on this?

Oh, up to now I have blissfully ignored cross-compilation issues in git
outside of configure.ac.  :-)

> > IOW are you certain that configure (with your patch) will override _all_ 
> > uname_S dependent settings?

No, I am certain they won't override them at all.

Fixing Makefile will be more (but independent) work.  All I did was get
configure.ac in shape to not error out in the face of cross compilation.

> It may be a valid question but it is not limited to cross compilation, is
> it?  The matter is if values the Makefile wants to default to can be
> overriden by whatever is placed in config.mak, and as long as that is Ok
> we won't have a problem with or without use of configure (which is a
> second class citizen).

Yeah, I figured that.  I assume it makes little sense to suggest adding
AC_CANONICAL_HOST to configure.ac, letting config.{guess,sub} do their
job, and the user to use "./configure --host=some-value" to specify a
host alias, and then using the computed host triple to decide features,
without the need to modify Makefile or other input files.

See, in a way I come from the GNU world here, and that's what I know
best.  Since git does its own setup here, I trust you will invent some
way to solve this.

Thanks,
Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-20  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-15 13:22 autoconf: C99 format check Julius Naperkowski
2009-01-16  9:41 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-01-19 20:34   ` [PATCH] Provide pessimistic defaults for cross compilation tests Ralf Wildenhues
2009-01-19 23:39     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-20  2:49       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-20  6:59         ` Ralf Wildenhues [this message]
2009-01-20  6:50     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-20  7:04       ` Ralf Wildenhues

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090120065939.GC5561@ins.uni-bonn.de \
    --to=ralf.wildenhues@gmx.de \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j.nap@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).