From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: [PATCH] gittutorial: remove misleading note Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:17:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20090123211734.GJ21473@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <1232733749-6120-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> <7vk58lvoe5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ed2sj0fx90rgoibw" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 23 22:19:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQTQe-0005jO-3B for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:19:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755724AbZAWVRi (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:17:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755646AbZAWVRh (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:17:37 -0500 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([212.40.97.103]:48012 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755518AbZAWVRg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:17:36 -0500 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB5A5809A; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80594465E; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:17:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B266E11B87A9; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:17:34 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vk58lvoe5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --ed2sj0fx90rgoibw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00:18AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > So we have a usability regression here. Perhaps we need to fix that > instead? I thought that's on purpose. By doing a 'git fetch ' I don't say "what" to fetch, just "from where". Would it be better to fetch HEAD in that case? --ed2sj0fx90rgoibw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkl6M+4ACgkQe81tAgORUJa0zgCgmEz1MKBDp5TxcoA+JXuSoHHK u88AoKf3bOzO0zNZPN+yGCXNZiSxwsUv =tgi1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ed2sj0fx90rgoibw--