From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: Heads up: major rebase -i -p rework coming up Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:10:54 +0900 Message-ID: <20090128071054.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: <20090127092117.d13f24e7.stephen@exigencecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org, Thomas Rast , Bjrn Steinbrink To: Stephen Haberman X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 27 23:12:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRwAu-0003i6-PW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:12:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752639AbZA0WL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:11:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751519AbZA0WL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:11:26 -0500 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:37540 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751445AbZA0WLZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:11:25 -0500 Received: from d.earth.lavabit.com (d.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.13]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0264C8889; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:11:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from 2774.lavabit.com (212.62.97.21) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id WH697K44455V; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:11:24 -0600 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=nT4byFKIhfLZ34/mRhZAkGUnzSWpoulHS373ole+kSTFuHR+eSjSuQGEgEfOg6VAQcLCAs1kE1CQ1XRgZCNAn7texPeR+tGBywsfLgKSEm8wsQNW3ls/qhW6Ekq8wblBFPw+OxcCmLW6CJMdNYkKSj9zVG2bsYHqO5OaUhh8Bb8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: <20090127092117.d13f24e7.stephen@exigencecorp.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Stephen Haberman : > My primary pain point with rebase-i-p has been rebasing a branch that > has merged in another branch that has a lot of commits on it. E.g.: > > a -- b -- c origin/feature > \ > d -- e feature > / > ... g origin/master > > Where e is merging in, say, a latest release that had a few hundred > commits in the master branch. After resolving conflicts/etc. in e, I > want to rebase d..e from a to be on c. Sorry for asking a basic question, but if "feature" is a topic branch for advance the feature, why are you merging origin/master into it? Doesn't it blur the theme of the branch by including "development of the feature and all the random things that happened while it was being developed in other places"? -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/