From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #07; Wed, 28) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20090129033816.GB11836@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7vwscej26i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 29 04:39:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSNko-000189-V9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:39:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753946AbZA2DiT (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753867AbZA2DiT (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:19 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:46915 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753305AbZA2DiS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 28326 invoked by uid 107); 29 Jan 2009 03:38:27 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:27 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:38:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vwscej26i.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 06:06:45PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * js/valgrind (Wed Jan 21 02:36:40 2009 +0100) 2 commits > - valgrind: ignore ldso errors > - Add valgrind support in test scripts > > Dscho and Peff had further exchanges on the list; I am sort of waiting for > the conclusion before picking any intermediate version up. I think I gave an OK to the last version posted, but then the last thing I saw from Dscho was "I have a new patch, but I'm not posting it right this second": http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/107300 followed by much "is zlib broken" discussion which I think doesn't hold us up (either it is a bug in zlib, in which case it is not our problem, or it is a false positive, in which case we just add a suppression). So I think we are waiting for the next round from Johannes. > * jk/valgrind (Thu Oct 23 04:30:45 2008 +0000) 2 commits > . valgrind: ignore ldso errors > . add valgrind support in test scripts I think it probably makes sense to drop these at this point. Dscho's more recent work should be the basis to which new patches are compared. -Peff