From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Something weird is happening... Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:35:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20090129223529.GB1465@elte.hu> References: <49814BA4.6030705@zytor.com> <7vfxj1eqh6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <49822944.8000103@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: "H. Peter Anvin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 29 23:37:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSfVS-0006zo-17 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:37:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753310AbZA2Wfl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:35:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753372AbZA2Wfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:35:40 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:60131 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751678AbZA2Wfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:35:39 -0500 Received: from elvis.elte.hu ([157.181.1.14]) by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1LSfTv-0000uC-0m from ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:35:36 +0100 Received: by elvis.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1004) id F06503E21AA; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:35:27 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49822944.8000103@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Received-SPF: neutral (mx3: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu; X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> But it still does the connectivity check fully from your refs. And if >> it finds an object that ought to be reachable from your refs that it >> hasn't validated, it gives the "missing" warning above. There is a >> check to exclude objects in packs when running "git fsck" without >> --full from this warning but I do not see a corresponding exclusion of >> objects that were borrowed from your neighbour which we didn't check >> either. >> >> But that is just a conjecture from a cursory looking at the current >> code. I do not remember (or did not know from the beginning) some >> details of it. And that is why I asked you if "git fsck --full" reports >> it missing in my earlier response to you. > > Just tried it, it doesn't. So I guess things are OK. hm, it reported missing items here - but maybe i misremembered that. Re-running it currently. (takes quite a while) Ingo