From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] chain kill signals for cleanup functions Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:20 -0500 Message-ID: <20090131014420.GA7696@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20090122042643.GB31427@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090122060235.GC30133@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090130075552.GA27716@coredump.intra.peff.net> <4982B68C.2070207@viscovery.net> <20090130082101.GA28809@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vd4e49v48.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 31 02:45:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LT4ve-0003gy-7N for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:45:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752496AbZAaBoZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752137AbZAaBoY (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:24 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:58067 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992AbZAaBoY (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:24 -0500 Received: (qmail 8975 invoked by uid 107); 31 Jan 2009 01:44:34 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:34 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vd4e49v48.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:28:39PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Hmm. Clever. > > > > Junio, can you apply this on top of the jk/signal-cleanup topic? > > Will do, but I've been sick today, haven't caught up with the list > traffic, and I do not think I'll be reading my mails for the rest of the > day either. It may take some time for it to appear in the public > repositories. No problem. It really is a fix for a false negative in the test, not any actual git bug, so no rush. Now I'm off to go make fun of you, buried deep in a thread where you won't see it. -Peff