From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: Heads up: major rebase -i -p rework coming up Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:05:17 +0900 Message-ID: <20090203190517.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: <7vwscjceec.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200901252303.29204.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Jakub Narebski , Junio C Hamano , Sverre Rabbelier , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 03 11:07:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUIBm-0001Ib-AG for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:07:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751641AbZBCKGA (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:06:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751120AbZBCKGA (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:06:00 -0500 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:49610 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbZBCKF7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:05:59 -0500 Received: from d.earth.lavabit.com (d.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.13]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C45C86AD; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:05:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from 1843.lavabit.com (212.62.97.21) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id 7TANVNHIGT0S; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:05:58 -0600 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=FBqxwx5RyxBsrjGg6zkxMgJHe5vf2DZ6eTpQX8dnGHxd+6+OzzBNTeaVxe429uWJiSaXduqstNBktZhHaEBlNDW+aa2u3Z3ECGJPbF9IHCaYWq29OT+gAzQvQWDXrA8JEwLZffZ3p1MYPftAD87bXWiyRJQleydjL0Y211q2mUQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Johannes Schindelin : > Nanako had a script at some stage; I would prefer an subcommand to "git > rerere" which reconstructs the whole merge in-memory, and then records the > conflict's resolution. I'm sorry but I'm not sure what script of mine you are referring to. -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/