From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Comments on "Understanding Version Control" by Eric S. Raymond Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:49:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20090205004905.GE8945@mit.edu> References: <200902021948.54700.jnareb@gmail.com> <200902040304.05028.jnareb@gmail.com> <20090204235436.GA8945@mit.edu> <200902050108.14033.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Eric S. Raymond" To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 05 01:50:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUsRu-0006Mk-J6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:50:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755005AbZBEAtJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:49:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753777AbZBEAtI (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:49:08 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:36801 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751655AbZBEAtI (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:49:08 -0500 Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1LUsQU-0003jH-Rq; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:49:06 -0500 Received: from tytso by closure.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUsQU-0002WF-3W; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:49:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902050108.14033.jnareb@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:08:13AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:04:02AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > > I guess that this mailing list is subscribe-only, isn't it? So doing > > > CC to uvc-reviewers wouldn't, unfortunately, cut? > > > > According to the Wayback Archive's record of the uvc-reviewers mailman > > listinfo was open for anyone to join, and the archives were public, > > which is why I don't mind sharing the archives with anyone who asks. > > What I meant here was whether to send email to uvc-reviewers mailing > list I have to be subscribed or not? Because if you have to be > subscribed, even if it is open subscription and not by invitation only, > it would make it impossible to have discussion on git mailing list as > a main venue, and just CC: (send copies) to uvc-reviewers list. Well, given that the mailman web interface is dead and gone, I'm guessing the mailing list itself is also dead, so the point is rather moot. I assume that if Eric thought the list is useful, he'll set it up again when he starts active development on his paper again --- or not. - Ted