From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: What is not in git.git Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:49:18 +0900 Message-ID: <20090205054918.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ecashin@coraid.com, arjen@yaph.org, joey@kitenet.net, benny.kra@googlemail.com, pw@padd.com, simon@lst.de, jidanni@jidanni.org, dirker@gmail.com, hoxu@users.sf.net To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 04 21:51:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUoi7-0006Kq-5E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:51:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756848AbZBDUtg convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:49:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758095AbZBDUtf (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:49:35 -0500 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:55904 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758036AbZBDUtd (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:49:33 -0500 Received: from d.earth.lavabit.com (d.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.13]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31AAC86BB; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:49:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from 7071.lavabit.com (212.62.97.21) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id DD1BYAB2RYFB; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:49:32 -0600 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=oSrotxoA0M0RbSaui9J1jYDdrPJtOTrc8ORn/LB0g/Bc5uHeGe7e+CuFi7tcEwtM1njxtPZJMSkwpM0BbvMFPYBdrjiJ8w9AbDS9YubBeuVGxNLGnb38dXKg+ngE+/IK/MyLli/zODZIVxw6vAfH5jDAxOQ7y54DUwJiEXu8Y80=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: You keep mentioning 1.6.2 and I take it as a hint that the project is approaching the pre release freeze. There are some patches sent to the list that are not in git.git, and I am wondering what their statuses ar= e. 1. From: ecashin@coraid.com Subject: [PATCH] git-describe documentation: --match pattern is glo= b Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:21:53 -0500 Message-ID: I thought this was correct, but was missing a sign-off. Perhaps it = was dropped on the floor because it was sent in a wrong format that is harder to apply? 2. From: Arjen Laarhoven Subject: [PATCH 2/2] git-log: Follow file copies with 'git log --fo= llow -C -C' Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:37:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1232642245-94405-2-git-send-email-arjen@yaph.org> Junio seemed to like the patch but asked a question; I did not see = a response nor updated patch (sorry, I do not read C and cannot comme= nt on the correctness of the patch). 3. From: Joey Hess Subject: [PATCH] gitweb: support the rel=3Dvcs microformat Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:25:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20090107042518.GB24735@gnu.kitenet.net> A few exchanges of review comments and responses, and then this top= ic went dark. From: Benjamin Kramer Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: Use libc strlcpy on OSX Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:41:30 +0100 Message-ID: <7f978c810901240741k201f954dx1c0470186094ae24@mail.gmai= l.com> My reading of the thread is that the only remaining issue was to li= mit the change to specific versions, and I think people who use OSX can= help polish this topic to completion. 4. From: Pete Wyckoff Subject: [PATCH] git-p4: avoid syncing duplicate changes Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:45:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20090128164540.GA2137@padd.com> Nobody commented on this as far as I can tell. Do people not care about p4? Simon Hausmann seem to be the most recent active contribu= tor and perhaps he can comment on this patch. 5. From: jidanni@jidanni.org Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/git-show-branch.txt: compact -g Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:14:02 +0800 Message-Id: <1231211642-14463-1-git-send-email-jidanni@jidanni.org> I couldn't figure out what "compact -g" meant but other than that I think this patch is correct. Perhaps Junio has the author in his ma= il ignore list? 6. From: Alexander Potashev Subject: [PATCH] Replace deprecated dashed git commands in usage Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:39:27 +0300 Message-ID: <1231094367-8831-1-git-send-email-aspotashev@gmail.com> This should have been in 1.6.0 already but it is still not. Forgotten? 7. From: Dirk H=C3=B6rner Subject: [PATCH] git-cvsimport: add support for cvs pserver passwor= d scrambling. Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:06:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5794AED2-43FF-4441-8292-0C9BFB3139A2@gmail.com> I think Johannes Schindelin commented but then nothing happened to this patch. Is there any more work necessary for its inclusion? 8. From: Heikki Hokkanen Subject: [PATCH] git show-ref: add --remotes option. Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:23:47 +0300 Message-ID: <48F3A043.5070406@users.sf.net> I saw no comments but it is consistent with how git-rev-list allows you say branches and tags. Is there anything wrong with the patch? --=20 Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/