From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] shortstatus v1 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:36:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20090210213634.GA26954@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <1234227067-56666-1-git-send-email-tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com> <20090210110330.GB12089@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vwsbynv0o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090210181052.GA19634@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090210191118.GA26651@coredump.intra.peff.net> <4ac8254d0902101321w1b6171cfkf7a6253181324acd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Tuncer Ayaz X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 10 22:38:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LX0JM-0007hb-4k for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:38:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756654AbZBJVgi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:36:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753869AbZBJVgh (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:36:37 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:55274 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755548AbZBJVgh (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:36:37 -0500 Received: (qmail 18712 invoked by uid 107); 10 Feb 2009 21:36:53 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:36:53 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:36:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ac8254d0902101321w1b6171cfkf7a6253181324acd@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > I tried this and it did not run faster than my experiment. I'm surprised, based on the numbers you gave before. I guess your machine is just a lot slower than what I am experimenting with. I think you will have to profile to see what is taking so long, then, if you want to speed it up. > I had to add a missing opening curly brace in > have_untracked() before it compiled. Sorry about that. I added the comment just above directly into the patch, and obviously managed to butcher the brace while I was doing it. -Peff