From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Introduce config variable "diff.primer" Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:17:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20090214151759.GC3887@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1233598855-1088-1-git-send-email-keith@cs.ucla.edu> <1233598855-1088-2-git-send-email-keith@cs.ucla.edu> <20090203071516.GC21367@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20090206161954.GA18956@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090213222233.GA7424@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090214061538.GB3223@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Keith Cascio , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 14 16:19:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LYMJ2-0007Bj-Bq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:19:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751551AbZBNPSG (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:18:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751401AbZBNPSD (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:18:03 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:54254 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751008AbZBNPSC (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:18:02 -0500 Received: (qmail 32473 invoked by uid 107); 14 Feb 2009 15:18:20 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:18:20 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:17:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 07:24:54AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Yes, I also hate the name. I have been using it in the discussion for > > lack of a better term, but I really dislike it, as well. I think > > "diff.defaults" makes sense, but maybe something that suggests it is > > about command line options would be better. > > Why not spell it out? diff.defaultOptions Yes, that is much better than my suggestion. -Peff