git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: disallowing push to currently checked-out branch
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:02:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090216000220.GA3503@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902151613110.14911@asgard.lang.hm>

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 04:14:20PM -0800, david@lang.hm wrote:

>> Please, please, publicize that if there is somebody who is doing the same
>> as you (which I deem a dangerous workflow; I certainly do not use it
>> myself) that they will have to adjust their receive.denyCurrentBranch
>> variable.
>
> since this repository isn't use for anything other than publishing for  
> public access, what's so dangerous about it?
>
> what do you think that I should be doing instead?

What you are doing is not dangerous, because you are one of the clueful
users who understands that the repo is only for publishing, and has set
up a hook to (or is manually triggering) a checkout of the new contents.

It is the less clueful user who doesn't realize that his working tree
and index in the pushed-to repository contain totally bogus information
which can cause him to create bad commits or even lose work permanently.
Dealing with this is one of the most common FAQ's we see on the list.

So the proposal is about making you, the clueful user, set a config
option that promises you have a clue. Which is sad that this must impact
you, but unfortunately it is not a very good strategy to ask clueless
users to set a variable saying that they are so.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-16  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-15 21:31 [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 22:56   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 23:20 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-02-16  0:04   ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16  1:33     ` david
2009-02-16  1:47       ` david
2009-02-16  1:30         ` Julian Phillips
2009-02-16  4:01         ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  8:33         ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-02-16  8:51           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:17             ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 13:58               ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 17:13                 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 17:33                   ` Matthieu Moy
2009-02-16 17:43                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 18:48                     ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 20:02                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:12                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 21:15                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 22:28                             ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 22:52                               ` Jeff King
2009-02-17  5:53                                 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 11:28                                   ` PUSH_HEAD, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 17:29                                     ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 19:48                                       ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 22:20                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 22:42                                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 22:54                                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 19:24                     ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 20:09                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:42                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17  0:07                         ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17  0:18                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17  0:41                             ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17  0:56                               ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17  1:18                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17  0:57                               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 21:43                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 22:43                         ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 23:23                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17  0:23                             ` Jeff King
2009-02-17  0:43                               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17  1:29                                 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  3:50       ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  5:05         ` david
2009-02-16  4:05           ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  5:18             ` david
2009-02-16  4:37               ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  5:55                 ` david
2009-02-16  5:06                   ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:53                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 10:50                   ` dashed commands, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:53 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible david
2009-02-15 23:01   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:36     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16  0:14     ` david
2009-02-15 23:18       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16  0:38         ` david
2009-02-16  0:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:23           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 15:33             ` david
2009-02-16 14:40               ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-02-16  0:02       ` Jeff King [this message]
2009-02-16 10:06         ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Sergio Callegari
2009-02-15 23:01   ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:15     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:38       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-16  0:35       ` david
2009-02-16  0:07   ` send-email sending shallow threads by default Jeff King
2009-02-16  0:09     ` Pieter de Bie
2009-02-16  2:43       ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  2:55         ` Brian Gernhardt
2009-02-16  9:56         ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-02-16  7:55     ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-02-16 10:38     ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17  8:34       ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-17  9:06         ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 19:28           ` Jeff King
2009-02-20  3:03             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20  3:26               ` Jeff King
2009-02-20  4:13                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-17  8:30     ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-16  1:27   ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Sitaram Chamarty
2009-02-16  8:04   ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16  8:49     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16  9:07       ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16  2:42 ` [RFC - draft #2] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16  3:20   ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 21:10   ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090216000220.GA3503@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).