From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Rast Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] format-patch: thread as reply to cover letter even with in-reply-to Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:27:04 +0100 Message-ID: <200902170027.09406.trast@student.ethz.ch> References: <200902162134.28850.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1405767.nhKByW6jN2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Daniel Barkalow To: Jakub Narebski , Jay Soffian X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 17 00:28:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZCtJ-0001VY-0j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:28:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751844AbZBPX1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:27:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751402AbZBPX1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:27:13 -0500 Received: from xsmtp1.ethz.ch ([82.130.70.13]:20400 "EHLO xsmtp1.ethz.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbZBPX1M (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:27:12 -0500 Received: from xfe0.d.ethz.ch ([82.130.124.40]) by xsmtp1.ethz.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:27:11 +0100 Received: from thomas.localnet ([84.75.148.62]) by xfe0.d.ethz.ch over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:27:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.27.7-9-default; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2009 23:27:10.0585 (UTC) FILETIME=[17349E90:01C9908E] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --nextPart1405767.nhKByW6jN2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Jakub Narebski wrote: > Thomas Rast writes: > > Jay Soffian wrote: >=20 > > > I think this change may be okay, but I think to go with it the > > > cover-letter and all the patches should have a "References:" header > > > with the message-id given by --in-reply-to. > >=20 > > That's a completely separate issue. I'm only proposing to change > > what is formatted as a reply to what, the In-Reply-To and References > > formatting is handled by the existing code. [...] > patches had both '--in-reply-to' message id AND cover letter id in > "References:" header. That would make for safer threading... Oh, now I see what you meant. It seems that right now, send-email appends the right references for =2D-thread mode, and format-patch only does the one-reference case. I'll try and make a patch for that. =2D-=20 Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch --nextPart1405767.nhKByW6jN2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmZ9k0ACgkQqUud07tmzP01+ACcD6fzC+P3cPs/AYJu6jTk1sUy yuQAn1D7l2/Z1GA8jfBQrg2i3DfA9YYI =sDrO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1405767.nhKByW6jN2--