From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] t3301: use test_must_fail instead of ! Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:16:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20090218101615.GA23035@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <8c50889d27e5baec1cbbd9a5775fa80b986c6df6.1234642638.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> <7vvdrcnnl0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200902151711.45099.trast@student.ethz.ch> <20090215181818.GA2291@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090217163413.GB31297@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20090217202731.GA16586@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090218064121.GA16611@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Mike Ralphson , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 18 11:17:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZjUw-0003QF-08 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:17:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751913AbZBRKQT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:16:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751905AbZBRKQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:16:18 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:44318 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751898AbZBRKQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:16:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 13177 invoked by uid 107); 18 Feb 2009 10:16:38 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:16:38 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:16:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:14:10AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > I can now get as far as t3404, which seems to have problems due to > > rebase-interactive using parentheses, "-a", and "-o" with "test". > > The parentheses will be fixed soon, but "-a" and "-o" really are > necessary. Really? Are they not easily replaced with -test cond1 -a cond2 -o cond3 +test cond1 && test cond2 || test cond3 ? The trickier part is the grouping, but that is what the parentheses are doing. -Peff