From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: send-email sending shallow threads by default Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20090220032607.GE22419@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7vk57ridyx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090216000732.GC3503@coredump.intra.peff.net> <499A769B.2080308@op5.se> <20090217192855.GB15625@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Martin Mares , Andreas Ericsson , david@lang.hm, Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 20 04:27:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LaM3A-0006aG-1z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:27:40 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752866AbZBTD0M (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752724AbZBTD0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:10 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:51169 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752686AbZBTD0J (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:09 -0500 Received: (qmail 31267 invoked by uid 107); 20 Feb 2009 03:26:31 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:31 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:03:27PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > send-email does write a new date header. Which is actually desirable, > > IMHO, because otherwise rebased patches would get sent with their > > original date, which might very well long in the past (and not only is > > that confusing, but it would probably trip spam filters). > > Can we ensure that all of the messages sent differ in date by 1 second? > Keeping them in order for anyone who looks at the transmit date. I think it already does: $ git show a5370b16 commit a5370b16c34993c1d0f65171d5704244901e005b Author: Eric Wong Date: Sat Mar 25 03:01:01 2006 -0800 send-email: try to order messages in email clients more correctly If --no-chain-reply-to is set, patches may not always be ordered correctly in email clients. This patch makes sure each email sent from a different second. -Peff