From: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
To: Myxz Ptlk <Adrian.Klingel@illumaware.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git rebase aggravation
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:34:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902231034.08736.trast@student.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22155203.post@talk.nabble.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2406 bytes --]
Myxz Ptlk wrote:
> 1) Rebase master into zoo.
>
> 2) Merge zoo into master.
You may want to consider a merge and topic branch based workflow. man
gitworkflows has some pointers.
For the rest of the discussion let's assume that your history looks
like
*---*---*---* (master)
\
\
o---o---o (zoo = origin/zoo)
Since you have tracking branches, origin/zoo should be the same as
zoo. (origin/master should exist too but isn't important for now.)
> But here is what happens. I spend 3 hours inside "zoo" doing "git rebase
> master". I go through all the hell of reconciling 6 months of development.
> Then at the end, it just says that the commits now differ between local
> "zoo" and "origin/zoo".
Indeed, since you rewrote every commit on zoo, it now looks like
*---*---*---* (master)
| \
| \
\ o'--o'--o' (zoo)
\
o---o---o (origin/zoo)
> So I figure, I will pull from "origin/zoo". Naturally, that results in a
> conflicted merge, which I then clear up. I commit the merge, then push
> everything back to the remote branch.
You're merging like this:
*---*---*---* (master)
| \
| \
\ o'--o'--o'---M (zoo)
\ /
o---o---o---------------'
(origin/zoo)
I think you can already see that you made a mess of history :-)
You should have forced the push instead. But see "recovering from
upstream rebase" in man git-rebase for information on what happens to
everyone else's work that was based on zoo.
> My thinking is that if I were to attempt a new rebase of master, the
> beginning of what would be rebased would start from RIGHT NOW, instead of
> all the commits over the past 6 months. To check this, I type:
>
> git rebase master
>
> from "zoo". Lo and behold, it starts the whole process over again. I "git
> rebase --abort", but I am very, very confused.
Actually it's even worse: it should attempt to rebase _every_ commit
in master..zoo. If master has progressed since your original
rebase+merge, this will be both the "o" and "o'" commits above.
(Except the ones that did not conflict at all, since they'll still be
the same.)
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 4:20 Git rebase aggravation Myxz Ptlk
2009-02-23 4:34 ` Nazri Ramliy
2009-02-23 9:34 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902231034.08736.trast@student.ethz.ch \
--to=trast@student.ethz.ch \
--cc=Adrian.Klingel@illumaware.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).