From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: Git and Eclipse 3.5M5 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:11:57 +0100 Message-ID: <200902242011.57860.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> References: <20090224153437.GS22848@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Velevitch , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 24 20:13:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lc2in-0003ZR-Tz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:13:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753366AbZBXTMK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:12:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753344AbZBXTMI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:12:08 -0500 Received: from mail.dewire.com ([83.140.172.130]:19424 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752861AbZBXTMI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:12:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3B9147E9F8; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:11:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino.dewire.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nf2Tal1aRAI; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:11:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from sleipner.localnet (unknown [10.9.0.2]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370D2147E9F7; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:11:59 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.27-12-generic; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20090224153437.GS22848@spearce.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Chris Velevitch wrote: > > Has the Eclipse plugin been tested with Eclipse 3.5M5 (Mac OSX 10.5 Intel)? > > I don't think so. Been too busy with other stuff to get that far. > > Any success/failure reports we should be aware of? I've run it briefly out of curiosity (x86 Linux) and it seemed fine. Please go ahead, try it and report any problems. -- robin