From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tests for git log --pretty, --format and --oneline. Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:57:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20090225095741.GB16357@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7vljrvhh13.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1235509597-18336-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <7vtz6i4zah.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Felipe Contreras , git@vger.kernel.org, Nanako Shiraishi To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 25 10:59:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LcGYH-0003j2-Cv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:59:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762019AbZBYJ5s (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:57:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762014AbZBYJ5r (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:57:47 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:45459 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760621AbZBYJ5q (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:57:46 -0500 Received: (qmail 25353 invoked by uid 107); 25 Feb 2009 09:58:09 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:58:09 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:57:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vtz6i4zah.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:54:30AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Because 4202 seems to be about testing the log functionality and they rely > on correctly working format output to verify other aspects of the > operation of "git log", I initially was not sure if this is the right > place to add these new tests. After looking around I didn't find any > existing test that checks the various --pretty output formats that the new > tests can be added, so this probably is as good a place as any. t6006? -Peff